Merge branch 'master' of github.com:dopefishh/tt2015
[tt2015.git] / a2 / 1cases.tex
1 \subsection{Preflight checklist}
2 Before actual certification is commenced we perform a manual test using a
3 checklist.
4 If any of the checks fail we immediately reject the product.
5 The checklist is given in the table below. All commands in \texttt{monospace}
6 are to be run in a terminal. Commands prefixed with a \texttt{\#} should be run
7 with root permissions. Commands prefixed with a \texttt{\$} should be run with
8 user permissions.
9
10 \begin{longtable}{|l|rp{.8\linewidth}|}
11 \hline
12 Check 1 & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{Get the SUT in a workable state.}\\
13 \hline
14 \multirow{3}{*}{Course of action}
15 & 1. & Import the VirtualBox image into VirtualBox.\\
16 & 2. & Boot the vm.\\
17 & 3. & Verify the SUT booted successfully and the network modules are
18 loaded.\\
19 \hline
20 Passed & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{\textit{Yes/No}}\\
21 \hline\hline
22 Check 2 & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{Verify the SUT is complete.}\\
23 \hline
24 \multirow{5}{*}{Course of action}
25 & 1. & Boot the SUT as in \emph{Check 1}.\\
26 & 2. & Verify the loopback device exists by running
27 \texttt{\$ ifconfig}.\\
28 & 3. & Verify the \emph{echo-server} is present on the system by running
29 \texttt{\$ file code/server/Main.java}\\
30 & 4. & Verify \emph{Scapy} is present on the system by running
31 \texttt{\$ scapy}.\\
32 & 5. & Verify all scripts used for testing are present on the system.\\
33 \hline
34 Passed & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{\textit{Yes/No}}\\
35 \hline\hline
36 Check 3 & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{Initialize the testing environment..}\\
37 \hline
38 \multirow{6}{*}{Course of action}
39 & 1. & Boot the SUT as in \emph{Check 1}.\\
40 & 2. & Setup iptables by executing
41 \texttt{\# code/iptables.sh}~\footnote{The IPTables script ensures
42 that the OS does not drop packets due to an the unknown source.}\\
43 & 3. & Navigate to the working directory by running
44 \texttt{\$ cd /home/student/tt2015}\\
45 & 4. & Compile the echo server by running
46 \texttt{\# cd code/server \&\& make}\\
47 & 5. & Start the echo server by running
48 \texttt{\# cd code/server \&\& java Main}\\
49 & 6. & Generate all test cases by running
50 \texttt{\$ python code/client/gen.py}\\
51 \hline
52 Passed & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{\textit{Yes/No}}\\
53 \hline\hline
54 Check 4 & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{Test the tool environment.}\\
55 \hline
56 \multirow{3}{*}{Course of action}
57 & 1. & Initialize the SUT as in \emph{Check 3}\\
58 & 2. & Execute the test script by running
59 \texttt{\# code/client/helloworld.py}\\
60 & 3. & Verify the console displays a success message.\\
61 \hline
62 Passed & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{\textit{Yes/No}}\\
63 \hline\hline
64 Check 5 & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{All test inputs and scripts are present.}\\
65 \hline
66 \multirow{2}{*}{Course of action}
67 & 1. & Boot the SUT as in \emph{Check 1}.\\
68 & 2. & Verify that the test generation script is present by running
69 \texttt{\$ file code/client/test.py}\\
70 \hline
71 Passed & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{\textit{Yes/No}}\\
72 \hline
73 \caption{Preflight checklist\label{tbl:preflight}}
74 \end{longtable}
75
76 \subsection{Testing of SUT}
77 The SUT is a series of services for other computer programs with no end-user
78 facing interface. Therefore the SUT will be tested solely by calling it's
79 services through various automated scripts. An automated test suite will be
80 available which executes all these automated scripts and aggregates their
81 results to asses whether or not the SUT has passed the test.
82
83 The implementation of the SUT is tested using black box testing techniques. A
84 series of tests asses the correctness of the implementation with regards to the
85 TCP specification. These tests are specified in Table~\textbf{referentie naar
86 tests-tabel}. The test cases aim to cover the most interesting parts of the TCP
87 specification.
88
89 To cover the TCP specification as complete as possible while still maintaining
90 a feasible test suite the tests are divided into equivalence partitions. Below
91 these partitions are given.
92
93 \begin{enumerate}
94 \item \emph{Number of segments} in request~\footnote{A request is
95 considered establishing a connection (handshake) and a number of
96 payload segments}
97 \begin{enumerate}
98 \item 0 payload segments
99 \item 1 payload segments
100 \item n=small payload segments (1 byte)
101 \item n=big payload segments (65495 bytes)
102 \end{enumerate}
103 \item \emph{source port}
104 \begin{enumerate}
105 \item Correct
106 \item Incorrect
107 \end{enumerate}
108 \item \emph{destination port}
109 \begin{enumerate}
110 \item Correct
111 \item Incorrect
112 \end{enumerate}
113 \item Bit errors in \emph{payload}
114 \begin{enumerate}
115 \item Correct payload
116 \item Payload with bit flips that do not show in checksum
117 \item Payload with bit flips that do show in checksum
118 \end{enumerate}
119 \item \emph{checksum}
120 \begin{enumerate}
121 \item Correct
122 \item Incorrect
123 \end{enumerate}
124 \item \emph{Segment order}
125 \begin{enumerate}
126 \item Correct
127 \item Out of order
128 \item Missing Segments
129 \end{enumerate}
130 \end{enumerate}
131
132 These partitions were chosen since they correspond to key parts of the TCP
133 specification.
134
135 TCP segments are send over a TCP connection from a \emph{source} to a \emph{destination port}. Therefore segments which are received that have a
136 source or destination port set to an incorrect value should not be regarded
137 as segments belonging to the connection by the SUT.
138
139 TCP uses a \emph{checksum} to catch any error introduced in headers, when this
140 checksum does not match the actual computed checksum the SUT should
141 disregard the received segment.
142
143 The TCP checksum is also an inherently weak one, as it is simply the
144 bitwise negation of the addition, in ones complement arithmetic,
145 of all 16 bit words in the header and data of the segment (excluding the
146 checksum itself). Therefore any \emph{bit error} where the ones complement value
147 of one word
148 increases by one, and the value of another decreases by one, is undetected.
149 The SUT should exhibit the same behavior and accept packets where these type
150 of bit errors occur.
151
152 TCP guarantees that segments are delivered \emph{in order}
153 ,even when they are received
154 out of order and that missing segments are resend. The SUT should
155 exhibit the same behavior. If segments are received out of order it should
156 either reassemble them when the missing packet has arrived or request them to
157 be resend when the Missing segments should be re-requested (by ACK-ing
158 the correct sequence number).
159
160 \bigskip
161
162 Partitions 2 to 6 are tested using pairwise testing to keep the number of test
163 cases feasible. The pairs are then all *except some where it does not make sense
164 to do so) tested with the different request sizes of partition 1.
165
166 This is expressed in Table~\ref{table:testpairs}. In this table the first five
167 columns represent the different options for the partitions 2 to 6 of the above
168 enumeration. The last four columns are the different number segments as
169 described in the partition 1 of the above enumeration. These cells identify
170 individual test cases by a number. An \xmark in the cell indicates that this
171 test case can not be created as it is not possible with that number of segments
172 (eg. sending segments out of order when the number of segments is 1).
173
174 \newcounter{TCC}
175 \setcounter{TCC}{1}
176 \newcommand{\doTCC}{\theTCC \stepcounter{TCC}}
177 \begin{table}[H]
178 \centering
179 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l||l|l|l|l|}
180 \hline
181 & \multicolumn{9}{c|}{\textbf{Partition}}\\
182 \hline
183 & 4 & 5 & 3 & 6 & 2 & 1a & 1b & 1c & 1d\\
184 \hline\hline
185 \multirow{9}{*}{Instance}
186 & a & a & a & a & a & \doTCC & \doTCC & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
187 & a & b & b & c & b & \xmark & \xmark & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
188 & c & a & b & a & b & \xmark & \xmark & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
189 & c & b & a & c & a & \xmark & \xmark & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
190 & b & a & b & c & a & \xmark & \xmark & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
191 & b & b & a & b & b & \xmark & \xmark & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
192 & c & b & b & a & b & \xmark & \doTCC & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
193 & b & b & b & a & b & \xmark & \doTCC & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
194 & a & b & b & b & a & \xmark & \xmark & \doTCC & \doTCC\\
195 \hline
196 \end{tabular}
197 \caption{Combinations of test cases}
198 \label{table:testpairs}
199 \end{table}
200
201 \subsection{Quality, completeness and coverage of tests}
202
203 The network packets used in testing are constructed from prerecorded, known to
204 be correct, network traffic. These packets are then modified with well used and
205 field tested tools. Due to this the chance of errors in the test cases is quite
206 low. However, no formal proof of correctness of the test cases is present, this
207 means that any defects found might not be the result of a fault in the SUT.
208 Therefore detected defects should only indicate there is a high chance that
209 there is a fault in the SUT and can not result directly in the conclusion that
210 there actually is one.
211
212 \bigskip
213
214 Due to the nature of black-box testing coverage of the code in the
215 implementation of the SUT is unknown. However completeness of the tests over
216 the specification of the SUT can be assessed.
217
218 \bigskip
219
220 Due to the clear and exhaustive specification of TCP the completeness of the
221 test suite can be clearly assessed.
222
223 As always, $100\%$ completeness is not feasible, therefore test cases are
224 carefully selected to cover the most interesting parts of the TCP specification
225 to ensure a complete but feasible test suite.
226
227 To further increase the coverage of the test suites tests are randomized. The
228 tests which test the handling of \emph{bit errors}, changes in the \emph{packet
229 order} and \emph{dropped packets} randomize where they introduce an error. The
230 test suite runs these tests multiple times to increase the likelihood that they
231 discover a fault which is only present when an error occurs in a certain
232 position.
233
234 To further decrease the number of tests needed test cases are divided into
235 equivalence partitions and the combination of cases as described in
236 Table~\ref{table:testpairs} ensures that all partitions are
237 covered and the number of individual tests is still feasible.
238
239
240 %
241 % wat ik ook probeer ik krijg de eerste collum
242 % zijn tekst niet verticaal gecentered
243 %
244
245
246 \subsection{Test cases}
247
248 Before every test case use the following steps to initialize the testing environment.
249
250 \begin{enumerate}
251 \item Boot the vm using VirtualBox.
252 \item Setup iptables by executing \texttt{\# code/iptables.sh}
253 \item Navigate to the working directory by running \texttt{\$ cd /home/student/tt2015}
254 \item Start the echo server by running \texttt{\# cd code/server \&\& java Main}
255 \end{enumerate}
256
257 \begin{longtable}{|p{.2\linewidth}|p{.8\linewidth}|}
258 \hline
259 Nr & 1 \\\hline
260 Title & Single valid request with 1byte payload. \\\hline
261 Input & Generated packets. \\\hline
262 Expected output & Packets echoed back by Echo-Server. \\\hline
263 \multirow{2}{*}{Course of action}
264 & 1. Use the steps listed above in order to start the SUT. \\
265 & 2. Execute the script by running \texttt{\# code/client/tests/1.py} \\\hline
266 Valid trace & Verify that the script prints 'Success'. \\\hline
267 \hline
268
269 Nr & 2 \\\hline
270 Title & Single valid request with 65495bytes payload. \\\hline
271 Input & Generated packets. \\\hline
272 Expected output & Packets echoed back by Echo-Server. \\\hline
273 \multirow{2}{*}{Course of action}
274 & 1. Use the steps listed above in order to start the SUT. \\
275 & 2. Execute the script by running \texttt{\# code/client/tests/2.py} \\\hline
276 Valid trace & Verify that the script prints 'Success'. \\\hline
277 \hline
278
279 Nr & 3 \\\hline
280 Title & 5 valid requests with 1byte payload. \\\hline
281 Input & Generated packets. \\\hline
282 Expected output & Packets echoed back by Echo-Server, in the same order as the client sent them. \\\hline
283 \multirow{2}{*}{Course of action}
284 & 1. Use the steps listed above in order to start the SUT. \\
285 & 2. Execute the script by running \texttt{\# code/client/tests/3.py} \\\hline
286 Valid trace & Verify that the script prints 'Success'. \\\hline
287 \hline
288
289 Nr & 4 \\\hline
290 Title & 5 valid requests with 65495bytes payload. \\\hline
291 Input & Generated packets with 65495bytes payload. \\\hline
292 Expected output & Packets echoed back by Echo-Server, in the same order as the client sent them. \\\hline
293 \multirow{2}{*}{Course of action}
294 & 1. Use the steps listed above in order to start the SUT. \\
295 & 2. Execute the script by running \texttt{\# code/client/tests/4.py} \\\hline
296 Valid trace & Verify that the script prints 'Success'. \\\hline
297 \hline
298
299 Nr & 5 \\\hline
300 Title & 5 valid requests with 1byte payload sent out of order. \\\hline
301 Input & Generated packets with 1byte payload, two packets are swapped in position. \\\hline
302 Expected output & All requests sent up to and including
303 the swapped packet with the lowest sequence number, the remaining packets are dropped. \\\hline
304 \multirow{2}{*}{Course of action}
305 & 1. Use the steps listed above in order to start the SUT. \\
306 & 2. Execute the script by running \texttt{\# code/client/tests/5.py} \\\hline
307 Valid trace & Verify that the script prints 'Success'. \\\hline
308 \hline
309 \end{longtable}
310
311 %\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{| l | X|}
312 %\hline
313 %Nr & 1 \\\hline
314 %Title & Single valid request. \\\hline
315 %Input & Pcap file with prerecorded valid packets. \\\hline
316 %Expected output & Pcap file with valid response to request. \\\hline
317 %Course of action & \begin{enumerate}
318 % \item Execute \emph{./scripts/tests/case1-single-valid.sh}
319 % \item Load \emph{output/case1.pcap} with ...
320 %\end{enumerate} \\\hline
321 %Valid trace & \begin{enumerate}
322 % \item \textbf{Hier packets benoemen?}
323 %\end{enumerate} \\\hline
324 %\end{tabularx}
325 %
326 %\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{| l | X|}
327 % \hline
328 % Nr & 2 \\\hline
329 %Title & Single request with corrupted checksum. \\\hline
330 % Input & Pcap file used as \emph{test-case 1} input. \\\hline
331 % Expected output & No response from SUT, logs with rejected packets. \\\hline
332 % Course of action & \begin{enumerate}
333 % \item Load input pcap file into ....
334 % \item Corrupt checksum of loaded packets.
335 % \item Save resulting packets as pcap file.
336 % \item Load new pcap file into ...
337 % \item Replay new pcap file.
338 % \item Record SUT response using...
339 % \item Extract log with rejected packets.
340 % \item Save recorded packets as a pcap file.
341 % \item Analyze packets in resulting file.
342 % \end{enumerate} \\\hline
343 % Valid trace & \begin{enumerate}
344 % \item \textbf{Aangeven welke packets corrupted zijn?}
345 % \end{enumerate} \\\hline
346 %\end{tabularx}
347 %\end{table}