\documentclass{article}

\usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\hypersetup{%
	pdfauthor={Mart Lubbers},
	pdfsubject={Short review},
	pdfcreator={Mart Lubbers},
	pdfproducer={Mart Lubbers},
	hidelinks
}

\author{Mart Lubbers (s4109503)}
\title{Model Learning}
\date{2016{--}06{-}01}

\begin{document}
\maketitle
\subsubsection*{Summary \& Evidence}
%Summary (as briefly as you can - two or three sentences)
The article is a survey on the current state of the art on model learning.
Model learning is the process in which a model is constructed by asking
membership queries.

%Evidence (what evidence is offered to support the claims?)
At first a brief introduction on the algorithms is given and after that the
current state of the art is given. By showing several case studies and
exploring the field and its challenges the current state is described. Moreover
the survey presents the latest improvements on the classical model learning
algorithms. While the field is still in infancy there are already some
promising results. 

\subsubsection*{Strengths \& Weaknesses}
%Strength (what positive basis is there for publishing/reading it?)
The paper is very readable and introduces the reader gradually to the subject
by showing, possibly simplified, descriptions of the algorithms. Via the
interesting case studies the reader is getting even more excited for the field.

%Weaknesses
Weaknesses are rare in this paper. The paper shows largely examples from the
Radboud University in Nijmegen. 

\subsubsection*{Evaluation}
%Evaluation (if you were running the conference/journal where it was published,
%would you recommend acceptance?)
For a general computer science journal I would accept this paper because it
gives a nice update on the state of the art and is very readable for someone
with no particular background information in the subject. However, the paper
does not present a new idea so it might not be suitable for a specialized
journal.

%Comments on quality of writing
There have been various typographical and/or typesetting found in the paper.
Also in some diagrams color is used whereas some people still print their
papers and thus miss crucial information if only greyscale printing is done.

\subsubsection*{Discussion}
%Queries for discussion
\begin{itemize}
	\item More examples from other regions and/or universities should be given.
	\item The basic information about Mealy machines could also be left out.
\end{itemize}

\end{document}
