-the current system} but this requires a very specific adapter to be written for
-every device and functionality. Oortgiese et al.\ lifted \gls{iTasks} from a
-single server model to a distributed server architecture~\todo{Add cite} that
-is also runnable on smaller devices like \acrshort{ARM}. However, this is
-limited to fairly high performance devices that are equipped with high speed
-communication lines. Devices in \gls{IoT} often only have LPLB communication
-with low bandwidth and a very limited amount of processing power. \glspl{mTask}
-will bridge this gap. It can run on devices as small as Arduino
-microcontrollers and operates via the same paradigms as regular \glspl{Task}.
-The \glspl{mTask} have access to \glspl{SDS} and can run small imperative
-programs.
-
-\section{Problem statement}
+the current \gls{iTasks} implementation} but this requires a very specific
+adapter to be written for every device and functionality. Oortgiese et al.\
+lifted \gls{iTasks} from a single server model to a distributed server
+architecture~\todo{Add cite} that is also runnable on smaller devices like
+\acrshort{ARM}. However, this is limited to fairly high performance devices
+that are equipped with high speed communication lines. Devices in \gls{IoT}
+often only have \gls{LTN} communication with low bandwidth and a very limited
+amount of processing power. \glspl{mTask} will bridge this gap. It can run on
+devices as small as Arduino microcontrollers and operates via the same
+paradigms as regular \glspl{Task}. The \glspl{mTask} have access to \glspl{SDS}
+and can run small imperative programs.