student numbers

[ssproject1617.git] / report / reflection.auditing_process.tex

diff --git a/report/reflection.auditing_process.tex b/report/reflection.auditing_process.tex
index 9413548..844a1d7 100644 (file)
--- a/report/reflection.auditing_process.tex
+++ b/report/reflection.auditing_process.tex
@@ -4,16 +4,16 @@
 We have noticed that, when doing an audit in a team, it is not feasible for
 everybody to have read all source code. Trying this is just a bad
 idea. We are happy to have divided the project by ASVS category, instead of
 We have noticed that, when doing an audit in a team, it is not feasible for
 everybody to have read all source code. Trying this is just a bad
 idea. We are happy to have divided the project by ASVS category, instead of

-program component. For each requirement the the ASVS, the
+program component. For each requirement the ASVS, the

 team had to verify that there were no mistakes in the code. This would have
 taken a lot of time if we had to verify each component for each requirement.
 Furthermore, the ASVS is an easy guide for dividing the work\footnote{The
 categories in the ASVS are all more or less of similar size. We settled on giving each team
 member two categories to check.}. Dividing by component would have been a lot
 harder to do fairly, especially because when beginning the project we had
 team had to verify that there were no mistakes in the code. This would have
 taken a lot of time if we had to verify each component for each requirement.
 Furthermore, the ASVS is an easy guide for dividing the work\footnote{The
 categories in the ASVS are all more or less of similar size. We settled on giving each team
 member two categories to check.}. Dividing by component would have been a lot
 harder to do fairly, especially because when beginning the project we had

-little knowledge of the internals (and component sizes) of the CMS.
+little knowledge of the internals (and component sizes) of the \CMS{}.

 
 

-We haven't experimented with working in pairs. This might be a good idea to
+We have not experimented with working in pairs. This might be a good idea to

 experiment with. We are confident however that, because we have all checked
 each other's finished work (and the final product), we did not miss any
 problems.
 experiment with. We are confident however that, because we have all checked
 each other's finished work (and the final product), we did not miss any
 problems.