tex opgeschoond'

[tt2015.git] / a4 / question3.tex

diff --git a/a4/question3.tex b/a4/question3.tex
index 212b38d..d088a21 100644 (file)
--- a/a4/question3.tex
+++ b/a4/question3.tex
@@ -1,36 +1,44 @@
-The table below contains some statistics about all the different parameter configurations we ran learnlib with.\r
-All except \emph{RivestSchapire} using the Random test method result in the correct model being learned. \r
-When \emph{WMethod} is selected as the testing method \emph{RivestSchapire} is also able to learn the correct model.\r
-\emph{WMethod} does however increase the time needed to learn the model significantly, when a different learner is used there is no reason not to use the Random testing method.\r
-\r
-\begin{longtable}{| l | l | l | c | c | c |}\r
-       \caption{Learning parameters and resulting model size.} \\\hline\r
-       Alphabet & Method & Test method & States & Time \\\hline \hline\r
-       small & LStar & Random & 2 & 12 sec \\\hline\r
-       small & TTT & Random & 2 & 5 sec \\\hline\r
-       small & RivestSchapire & Random & 2 & 6 sec \\\hline\r
-       small & KearnsVazirani & Random & 2 & 5 sec \\\hline\r
-       small & LStar & WMethod & 2 & 35 sec \\\hline\r
-       small & TTT & WMethod & 2 & 32 sec \\\hline\r
-       small & RivestSchapire & WMethod & 2 & 33 sec \\\hline\r
-       small & KearnsVazirani & WMethod & 2 & 33 sec \\\hline\r
-       \r
-       partial & LStar & Random & 4 & 18 sec \\\hline\r
-       partial & TTT & Random & 4 & 16 sec \\\hline\r
-       partial & RivestSchapire & Random & 4 & 13 sec \\\hline\r
-       partial & KearnsVazirani & Random & 4 & 22 sec \\\hline\r
-       partial & LStar & WMethod & 4 & 384 sec \\\hline\r
-       partial & TTT & WMethod & 4 & 390 sec \\\hline\r
-       partial & RivestSchapire & WMethod & 4 & 384 sec \\\hline\r
-       partial & KearnsVazirani & WMethod & 4 & 383 sec \\\hline\r
-       \r
-       full & LStar & Random & 5 & 44 sec \\\hline\r
-       full & TTT & Random & 5 & 25 sec \\\hline\r
-       full & RivestSchapire & Random & 4 & 12 sec \\\hline\r
-       full & KearnsVazirani & Random & 5 & 19 sec \\\hline\r
-       full & LStar & WMethod & 5 & 2666 sec \\\hline\r
-       full & TTT & WMethod & 5 & 2632 sec \\\hline\r
-       full & RivestSchapire & WMethod & 5 & 2638 sec \\\hline\r
-       full & KearnsVazirani & WMethod & - & - \\\hline\r
-\end{longtable}\r
+The table below contains some statistics about all the different parameter\r
+configurations we ran learnlib with.  All except \emph{RivestSchapire} using\r
+the Random test method result in the correct model being learned.  When\r
+\emph{WMethod} is selected as the testing method \emph{RivestSchapire} is also\r
+able to learn the correct model.\r
+\emph{WMethod} does however increase the time needed to learn the model\r
+significantly, when a different learner is used there is no reason not to use\r
+the Random testing method.\r
 \r
+\begin{table}[H]\r
+       \begin{tabular}{lllccc}\r
+               \toprule\r
+               Alphabet & Method & Test method & States & Time \\\r
+               \midrule\r
+               small & LStar & Random & 2 & 12 sec \\\r
+               small & TTT & Random & 2 & 5 sec \\\r
+               small & RivestSchapire & Random & 2 & 6 sec \\\r
+               small & KearnsVazirani & Random & 2 & 5 sec \\\r
+               small & LStar & WMethod & 2 & 35 sec \\\r
+               small & TTT & WMethod & 2 & 32 sec \\\r
+               small & RivestSchapire & WMethod & 2 & 33 sec \\\r
+               small & KearnsVazirani & WMethod & 2 & 33 sec \\\r
+               \r
+               partial & LStar & Random & 4 & 18 sec \\\r
+               partial & TTT & Random & 4 & 16 sec \\\r
+               partial & RivestSchapire & Random & 4 & 13 sec \\\r
+               partial & KearnsVazirani & Random & 4 & 22 sec \\\r
+               partial & LStar & WMethod & 4 & 384 sec \\\r
+               partial & TTT & WMethod & 4 & 390 sec \\\r
+               partial & RivestSchapire & WMethod & 4 & 384 sec \\\r
+               partial & KearnsVazirani & WMethod & 4 & 383 sec \\\r
+               \r
+               full & LStar & Random & 5 & 44 sec \\\r
+               full & TTT & Random & 5 & 25 sec \\\r
+               full & RivestSchapire & Random & 4 & 12 sec \\\r
+               full & KearnsVazirani & Random & 5 & 19 sec \\\r
+               full & LStar & WMethod & 5 & 2666 sec \\\r
+               full & TTT & WMethod & 5 & 2632 sec \\\r
+               full & RivestSchapire & WMethod & 5 & 2638 sec \\\r
+               full & KearnsVazirani & WMethod & - & - \\\r
+               \bottomrule\r
+       \end{tabular}\r
+       \caption{Learning parameters and resulting model size.}\r
+\end{table}\r