.

[phd-thesis.git] / dsl / class.tex

diff --git a/dsl/class.tex b/dsl/class.tex
index 5931da7..d5d3467 100644 (file)
--- a/dsl/class.tex
+++ b/dsl/class.tex
@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
 
 \input{subfilepreamble}
 
+\setcounter{chapter}{0}
+
 \begin{document}
+\input{subfileprefix}
 \chapter{Deep embedding with class}%
 \label{chp:classy_deep_embedding}
-
-\input{subfileprefix}
-
 \begin{chapterabstract}
        The two flavours of \gls{DSL} embedding are shallow and deep embedding.
        In functional languages, shallow embedding models the language constructs as functions in which the semantics are embedded.
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Consequently, adding new semantics, i.e.\ novel functions, is straightforward.
 It can be stated that the language constructs are embedded in the functions that form a semantics.
 If one wants to add a language construct, all semantics functions must be revisited and revised to avoid ending up with partial functions.
 
-This juxtaposition has been known for many years \citep{reynolds_user-defined_1978} and discussed by many others \citep{krishnamurthi_synthesizing_1998} but most famously dubbed the \emph{expression problem} by Wadler \citep{wadler_expression_1998}:
+This juxtaposition has been known for many years \citep{reynolds_user-defined_1978} and discussed by many others \citep{krishnamurthi_synthesizing_1998} but most famously dubbed the \emph{expression problem} by \citet{wadler_expression_1998}:
 
 \begin{quote}
        The \emph{expression problem} is a new name for an old problem.
@@ -685,7 +685,6 @@ For example, \citet{svenningsson_combining_2013} show that by expressing the dee
 This paper differs from those approaches in the sense that it does not require a core language in which all extensions need to be expressible.
 
 \subsection{Comparison}
-\todo[inline]{text moet beter}
 No \gls{DSL} embedding technique is the silver bullet.
 \Citet{sun_compositional_2022} provided a thorough comparison of embedding techniques including more axes than just the two stated in the expression problem.
 
@@ -870,15 +869,15 @@ e1 :: (Typeable c, UsingExt '[Neg, Subst]) => Expr c
 Giving an instance for \haskelllhstexinline{Interp} for \haskelllhstexinline{DataType} that uses the extensions \haskelllhstexinline{e_1, e2, ...} and depends on interpretations \haskelllhstexinline{i_1,i_2, ...} is done as follows:
 
 \begin{lstHaskellLhstex}
-instance ( UsingExt  '[e_1, e_2, ...] s
-               , DependsOn '[i_1, i_2, ...] s
-               ) => Interp (DataType s) where
+instance ( UsingExt  '[e_1, e_2, ...] s, DependsOn '[i_1, i_2, ...] s)
+               => Interp (DataType s) where
        ...
 \end{lstHaskellLhstex}
 
 With these enhancements, there is hardly any boilerplate required to use classy deep embedding.
 The \haskelllhstexinline{Record} data type; the \haskelllhstexinline{CreateRecord} type class; and the \haskelllhstexinline{UsingExt} and \haskelllhstexinline{DependsOn} type families can be provided as a library only requiring the programmer to create the extension constructors with their respective implementations and smart constructors for language construct extensions.
-The source code for this extension can be found here: \url{https://gitlab.com/mlubbers/classydeepembedding}.
+The source code for this extension can be found here: \url{https://gitlab.com/mlubbers/classydeepembedding}.\footnote{Lubbers, M. (2022): Library and examples for enhanced classy deep embedding.\ Zenodo.\ \href{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7277498}{10.5281/zenodo.7277498}.}
+It contains examples for expressions, expressions using \glspl{GADT}, detection of sharing in expressions (modelled after \citet{kiselyov_implementing_2011}), a \gls{GADT} version of sharing detection, and a region \gls{DSL} (modelled after \citet{sun_compositional_2022}).
 
 \section{Data types and definitions}%
 \label{sec:cde:appendix}