process the rest of george's comments

[msc-thesis1617.git] / methods.dsl.tex

diff --git a/methods.dsl.tex b/methods.dsl.tex
index 3b4181e..be8bf74 100644 (file)
--- a/methods.dsl.tex
+++ b/methods.dsl.tex
@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ Evermore so, extending the \gls{ADT} is easy and convenient but extending the
 views accordingly is tedious and has to be done individually for all views.
 
 The first downside of this type of \gls{EDSL} can be overcome by using
-\glspl{GADT}\cite{cheney_first-class_2003}. Listing~\ref{lst:exdeepgadt} shows
+\glspl{GADT}~\cite{cheney_first-class_2003}. Listing~\ref{lst:exdeepgadt} shows
 the same language, but type-safe with a \gls{GADT}. \glspl{GADT} are not
 supported in the current version of \gls{Clean} and therefore the syntax is
 hypothetical. However, it has been shown that \glspl{GADT} can be simulated
-using bimaps or projection pairs\cite{cheney_lightweight_2002}. Unfortunately
+using bimaps or projection pairs~\cite{cheney_lightweight_2002}. Unfortunately
 the lack of extendability remains a problem. If a language construct is added,
 no compile time guarantee is given that all views support it.