.

[phd-thesis.git] / top / finale.tex

diff --git a/top/finale.tex b/top/finale.tex
index 9caa86e..629a797 100644 (file)
--- a/top/finale.tex
+++ b/top/finale.tex
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ Traditional implementations of general purpose functional languages have high me
 There have been many efforts to create a general purpose functional language that does fit in small memory environments, albeit with some concessions.
 For example, there has been a history of creating tiny Scheme implementations for specific microcontrollers.
 It started with BIT \citep{dube_bit:_2000} that only required \qty{64}{\kibi\byte} of memory, followed by {PICBIT} \citep{feeley_picbit:_2003} and {PICOBIT} \citep{st-amour_picobit:_2009} that lowered the memory requirements even more.
-\Citep{suchocki_microscheme:_2015} created Microscheme, a functional language targeting \gls{ARDUINO} compatible microcontrollers.
+\Citet{suchocki_microscheme:_2015} created Microscheme, a functional language targeting \gls{ARDUINO} compatible microcontrollers.
 The {*BIT} languages all compile to assembly while Microscheme compiles to \gls{CPP}, heavily supported by \gls{CPP} lambdas available even on \gls{ARDUINO} AVR targets.
 An interpreted Lisp implementation called uLisp also exists that runs on microcontrollers with as small as the \gls{ARDUINO} {UNO} \citep{johnson-davies_lisp_2020}.