X-Git-Url: https://git.martlubbers.net/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=report%2Freflection.secure_development.tex;h=7abdba1b0a1540dbf0c2b65ec3badea1e5a0d414;hb=a3400d1700e841084471bd01f91ddf9234c9413f;hp=4729d4383dec2ee1a51069befcf2be1dde051a79;hpb=bbd53815ca081140fc8b22e9b4f2790bbad20528;p=ssproject1617.git

diff --git a/report/reflection.secure_development.tex b/report/reflection.secure_development.tex
index 4729d43..7abdba1 100644
--- a/report/reflection.secure_development.tex
+++ b/report/reflection.secure_development.tex
@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ development time. This would also require more careful planning of the
 development of the application.
 
 % Centralize user input
-Another improvement which would streamline the security audit would be to
-centralize the locations in which user input is handled. By doing this the whole
-class of vulnerabilities which stems from the handling of user input could be
+Another improvement which would streamline a security audit would be to
+centralize the locations in which user input is handled. By doing this, the whole
+class of vulnerabilities which stems from handling user input could be
 neutralized to an extent. This would be a relatively easy change in the
-development process with comparatively big security benefits.
+development process with big security benefits.
 
 % Centralize application output
-In the same category; during development the application could be designed in
+In the same category; the application could be designed in
 such a way that all dynamic output is sanitized before outputting it to the
 user. This would create another defense{-}in{-}depth layer for handling
 attacker controlled input.