-because no files were read and thus no privacy has been infringed on. One could
-even argue that the consequences were positive since the system administrators
-can improve the security of the system.
+because no files were read and thus no privacy has been infringed on and no
+negative consequences other than the time lost on this case have happened. One
+could even argue that the consequences were merely positive since the system
+administrators can improve the security of the system. This is of course a
+little short sighted because bad results have happened indirectly. If the hack
+becomes public the people will likely lose faith in the security of the system.
+Moreover, while the leak will be known to the administrators it might not be
+possible to fix it immediately due the nature of the breach or sheer resources.
+In short this means that in the eyes of \Jo{} his action had no negative
+effects but in contrary some members of the board will reason the other way
+around.