typo

diff --git a/2approach.tex b/2approach.tex
index 0b06e1e..634edf8 100644 (file)
--- a/2approach.tex
+++ b/2approach.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-

 %6
 %7
 %8
 %6
 %7
 %8


@@ -9,31 +8,32 @@
 
 The test process consists of several stages. The results of the first stage,
 planning, are descibed in this document. On the basis of this document actual
 
 The test process consists of several stages. The results of the first stage,
 planning, are descibed in this document. On the basis of this document actual

-test cases will be designed. Afterwards the actual tests will be implemented and
-executed. The results of these tests will then be evaluated against the exit
-criteria (see Section~\ref{sec:exitcriteria}) and depending on the outcome of
-these evaluations further tests might be deemed necessary.
+test cases will be designed. Afterwards the actual tests will be implemented
+and executed. The results of these tests will then be evaluated against the
+exit criteria (see Section~\ref{sec:exitcriteria}) and depending on the outcome
+of these evaluations further tests might be deemed necessary.

 
 \subsection{Quality Characteristics}
 The quality characteristics that are to be tested are described using the
 
 \subsection{Quality Characteristics}
 The quality characteristics that are to be tested are described using the

-ISO/IEC 25010 \cite{iso25010}. In the following sections we will discuss the
-relevant \textit{product quality} and \textit{quality in use} characteristics.
+ISO/IEC 25010 \cite{iso25010} as a guideline. In the following sections we will
+discuss the relevant \textit{product quality} and \textit{quality in use}
+characteristics.

 
 \subsubsection{Product quality}
 
 \subsubsection{Product quality}

-Product quality is divided into eight main categories which are divided into several
-subcategories. Below we will discuss the qualities which are relevant to the SUT.
+Product quality is divided into eight main categories which are divided into
+several subcategories. Below we will discuss the qualities which are relevant
+to the SUT.

 \begin{itemize}
 \begin{itemize}

-       \item \textbf{Functional suitability}\\  
+       \item \textbf{Functional suitability}\\

        As descibed in Section~\ref{sec:risks} the SUT is core functioanlity of the
        As descibed in Section~\ref{sec:risks} the SUT is core functioanlity of the

-       networking capable system. Because many other systems running on the
-       system could rely on it it is very important that the SUT is functionaly
-       suitable. Therefore all three subcharacteristics of Functional Suitability 
+       networking capable system. Because many other systems running on the system
+       could rely on it it is very important that the SUT is functionaly suitable.
+       Therefore all three subcharacteristics of Functional Suitability

        (\textit{Functional completeness, Functional correctness, Functional
        (\textit{Functional completeness, Functional correctness, Functional

-       appropriateness}) are of vital importance. As was previously mentioned
-       in Section~\ref{sec:risks} extra emphasis should be placed on testing
-       \emph{Functional Correctness} as recovery from Failures in 
+       appropriateness}) are of vital importance. As was previously mentioned in
+       Section~\ref{sec:risks} extra emphasis should be placed on testing
+       \emph{Functional Correctness} as recovery from Failures in

        computer-to-computer systems is problematic.
        computer-to-computer systems is problematic.

-

 \end{itemize}
 
 \end{itemize}
 

-\subsubsection{Quality in use}
\ No newline at end of file
+\subsubsection{Quality in use}