..

diff --git a/shorts2/Makefile b/shorts2/Makefile
index 21bfb84..c0fb457 100644 (file)
--- a/shorts2/Makefile
+++ b/shorts2/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 LATEX:=pdflatex
-DOCUMENTS:=maintainable.pdf
+DOCUMENTS:=maintainable.pdf batchers.pdf model.pdf
 
 all: $(DOCUMENTS)
 

diff --git a/shorts2/batchers.tex b/shorts2/batchers.tex
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3b70a96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/shorts2/batchers.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+\documentclass{article}
+
+\usepackage{a4wide}    % For better page usage
+\usepackage{hyperref}
+
+\hypersetup{%
+       pdfauthor={Mart Lubbers},
+       pdfsubject={Short review},
+       pdfcreator={Mart Lubbers},
+       pdfproducer={Mart Lubbers},
+       hidelinks
+}
+
+\author{Mart Lubbers (s4109503)}
+\title{Batcher's Odd-Even Merging Network Revealed}
+\date{2016{--}06{-}01}
+
+\begin{document}
+\maketitle
+\subsubsection*{Summary \& Evidence}
+%Summary (as briefly as you can - two or three sentences)
+
+%Evidence (what evidence is offered to support the claims?)
+
+\subsubsection*{Strengths \& Weaknesses}
+%Strength (what positive basis is there for publishing/reading it?)
+
+%Weaknesses
+
+\subsubsection*{Evaluation}
+%Evaluation (if you were running the conference/journal where it was published,
+%would you recommend acceptance?)
+
+%Comments on quality of writing
+
+\subsubsection*{Discussion}
+%Queries for discussion
+\begin{itemize}
+       \item 
+       \item
+       \item
+\end{itemize}
+
+\end{document}

diff --git a/shorts2/model.tex b/shorts2/model.tex
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5fe3306
--- /dev/null
+++ b/shorts2/model.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+\documentclass{article}
+
+\usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
+\usepackage{hyperref}
+
+\hypersetup{%
+       pdfauthor={Mart Lubbers},
+       pdfsubject={Short review},
+       pdfcreator={Mart Lubbers},
+       pdfproducer={Mart Lubbers},
+       hidelinks
+}
+
+\author{Mart Lubbers (s4109503)}
+\title{Model Learning}
+\date{2016{--}06{-}01}
+
+\begin{document}
+\maketitle
+\subsubsection*{Summary \& Evidence}
+%Summary (as briefly as you can - two or three sentences)
+The article is a survey on the current state of the art on model learning.
+Model learning is the process in which a model is constructed by asking
+membership queries.
+
+%Evidence (what evidence is offered to support the claims?)
+At first a brief introduction on the algorithms is given and after that the
+current state of the art is given. By showing several case studies and
+exploring the field and its challenges the current state is described. Moreover
+the survey presents the latest improvements on the classical model learning
+algorithms. While the field is still in infancy there are already some
+promising results. 
+
+\subsubsection*{Strengths \& Weaknesses}
+%Strength (what positive basis is there for publishing/reading it?)
+The paper is very readable and introduces the reader gradually to the subject
+by showing, possibly simplified, descriptions of the algorithms. Via the
+interesting case studies the reader is getting even more excited for the field.
+
+%Weaknesses
+Weaknesses are rare in this paper. The paper shows largely examples from the
+Radboud University in Nijmegen. 
+
+\subsubsection*{Evaluation}
+%Evaluation (if you were running the conference/journal where it was published,
+%would you recommend acceptance?)
+For a general computer science journal I would accept this paper because it
+gives a nice update on the state of the art and is very readable for someone
+with no particular background information in the subject. However, the paper
+does not present a new idea so it might not be suitable for a specialized
+journal.
+
+%Comments on quality of writing
+There have been various typographical and/or typesetting found in the paper.
+Also in some diagrams color is used whereas some people still print their
+papers and thus miss crucial information if only greyscale printing is done.
+
+\subsubsection*{Discussion}
+%Queries for discussion
+\begin{itemize}
+       \item More examples from other regions and/or universities should be given.
+       \item The basic information about Mealy machines could also be left out.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\end{document}