+The table below contains some statistics about all the different parameter configurations we ran learnlib with.\r
+All except \emph{RivestSchapire} using the Random test method result in the correct model being learned. \r
+When \emph{WMethod} is selected as the testing method \emph{RivestSchapire} is also able to learn the correct model.\r
+\emph{WMethod} does however increase the time needed to learn the model significantly, when a different learner is used there is no reason not to use the Random testing method.\r
+\r
\begin{longtable}{| l | l | l | c | c | c |}\r
\caption{Learning parameters and resulting model size.} \\\hline\r
Alphabet & Method & Test method & States & Time \\\hline \hline\r
full & KearnsVazirani & Random & 5 & 19 sec \\\hline\r
full & LStar & WMethod & 5 & 2666 sec \\\hline\r
full & TTT & WMethod & 5 & 2632 sec \\\hline\r
- full & RivestSchapire & WMethod & - & - \\\hline\r
+ full & RivestSchapire & WMethod & 5 & 2638 sec \\\hline\r
full & KearnsVazirani & WMethod & - & - \\\hline\r
-\end{longtable}
\ No newline at end of file
+\end{longtable}\r
+\r