From: Mart Lubbers <mart@martlubbers.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:52:57 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: final commit, project finished
X-Git-Url: https://git.martlubbers.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;p=co1314.git

final commit, project finished
---

diff --git a/LubbersReport.tex b/LubbersReport.tex
index ceaa068..01dd403 100644
--- a/LubbersReport.tex
+++ b/LubbersReport.tex
@@ -73,10 +73,10 @@ suffice. This corresponds with the pseudocode specified together with a rough
 estimate of the complexity in Listing~\ref{lst:improved}. The algorithm has a
 complexity lies in the $\mathcal{O}(nm)$ because the main loop repeats at
 maximum $n$ or $m$ times and the searching within the loop has a complexity of
-$n$ if the loop runs $m$ times and $m$ otherwise. 
+$n$ if the loop runs $m$ times and $m$ otherwise.  The polynomial growth allows
+the algorithm to be scaled relatively well.
 \begin{lstlisting}[caption={Improved approach}, label={lst:improved},
-                    keywords={[3]while,create,put,return,find,remove}
-]
+                    keywords={[3]while,create,put,return,find,remove}]
 n         - create list result of length n and initialize with -1
 n+m       - create list rows/columns that contain pairs of indices and sums of values
 nlgn      - sort the rows and columns list on ascending sum
@@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ c3        -   put the row/column pair in the results list
 c4        - return the results list
 \end{lstlisting}
 
-\section{Conclusion}
-
 \newpage
 \section{Appendices}
 \subsection{\textit{\href{http://www.java.com}{Java}} source}