From: Mart Lubbers <mart@martlubbers.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:49:40 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: update
X-Git-Url: https://git.martlubbers.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=930026ee2139512859a44ef8f65d2d0a3e54a62b;p=rsss1516.git

update
---

diff --git a/shorts/redblack.tex b/shorts/redblack.tex
index b767fd8..0cb68f2 100644
--- a/shorts/redblack.tex
+++ b/shorts/redblack.tex
@@ -15,9 +15,11 @@ way. This is possible because of properties of functional languages.
 
 \subsubsection*{Strengths \& Weaknesses}
 %Strength (what positive basis is there for publishing/reading it?)
-The paper is clear and straight to the point
+The paper is clear and straight to the point. It takes the reader by the hand.
 
 %Weaknesses
+On the other side the paper is very brief and could be considered shallow
+because of the lack of contents.
 
 \subsubsection*{Evaluation}
 %Evaluation (if you were running the conference/journal where it was published,
@@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ The paper is very short and quite some popular language is used.
 \subsubsection*{Discussion}
 %Queries for discussion
 \begin{itemize}
-	\item 
+	\item Is the paper too shallow?
+	\item Should benchmarks be added?
 \end{itemize}
 \end{document}