From: Mart Lubbers <mart@martlubbers.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:18:49 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: started with raw writeup
X-Git-Url: https://git.martlubbers.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b7071cd01ba2636b031930937310bc0eabe75748;p=paefcais1617.git

started with raw writeup
---

diff --git a/assignment1/.gitignore b/assignment1/.gitignore
index ecf702b..6ead008 100644
--- a/assignment1/.gitignore
+++ b/assignment1/.gitignore
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-./*.aux
-./*.fmt
-./*.log
-./*.mlog
-./*.pdf
+*.aux
+*.fmt
+*.log
+*.mlog
+*.pdf
+*.bbl
+*.blg
diff --git a/assignment1/Makefile b/assignment1/Makefile
index cb82052..9ddd8ec 100644
--- a/assignment1/Makefile
+++ b/assignment1/Makefile
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ all: $(DOC).pdf
 %.fmt: preamble.tex
 	$(LATEX) $(LATEXFLAGS) -ini -jobname="$(basename $@)" "&$(LATEX) $<\dump"
 
-%.pdf: %.tex %.fmt $(TEXS)
+%.pdf: %.tex %.fmt %.bib $(TEXS)
 	$(LATEX) $(LATEXFLAGS) $<
 	grep -q '^\\bibdata{' $(basename $<).aux && $(BIBTEX) $(basename $<) || true
 	$(LATEX) $(LATEXFLAGS) $< | tee $(basename $<).mlog
diff --git a/assignment1/a.bib b/assignment1/a.bib
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
diff --git a/assignment1/a.tex b/assignment1/a.tex
index a200ca1..322162c 100644
--- a/assignment1/a.tex
+++ b/assignment1/a.tex
@@ -5,17 +5,30 @@
 %Initial reaction
 %	What was your initial, gut reaction to the case when it was first presented
 %	to you?
-The gut reaction to this case is to not give Jon a heavy penalty. He is a
-well-performing student and did not spread or even look at the database
-records.
+The gut reaction to this case is to not give Jon a conditional heavy penalty.
+The action was clearly thought through and but still he was unable to
+understand the effects. This intuition arises mainly from the fact that no data
+was touched and Jon a well-performing student is but on the other hand he is a
+seasoned hacker in the eyes of his fellow students.
 
-%
 %Facts
 %	What important facts are you given for this case?
-%
+Several aspects of the case can shed light on the situation, 
+- Jon was a seasoned hacker and thus should have known the responsibility he
+	had. He was admired for these skills.
+-  Jon read the teacher's statement about security as a challenge while the
+	other students did not read it as such.
+- Jon immediately gave in and confessed while stating he did not meant to do
+	harm with it.
+- Jon said that this was his hobby. This means that he knows exactly what he is
+	doing.
+- The dean has a good idea of what hacking is in the eyes of computer science
+	students. However, some other in the board see ``hacking'' as deviant
+	behaviour and even explicitly quote it.
+
 %	Is any of the information you have been given irrelevant to the ethical
 %	assessment of the case?
-%
+
 %	Is there any additional information that you need that has not been
 %	provided?
 %
@@ -54,4 +67,8 @@ records.
 %		Present state of affairs
 %			--Law-> Minimally acceptable state of affairs
 %			--Exhortation-> Idea state of affairs
+
+\nocite{*}
+\bibliographystyle{ieeetr}
+\bibliography{a}
 \end{document}