up"

diff --git a/assignment1/a.tex b/assignment1/a.tex
index 322162c..f0ff563 100644 (file)
--- a/assignment1/a.tex
+++ b/assignment1/a.tex
@@ -28,41 +28,68 @@ Several aspects of the case can shed light on the situation,
 
 %      Is any of the information you have been given irrelevant to the ethical
 %      assessment of the case?
+Some irrelevant information is:
+- the location of the school
+- the courses he is taking
 
 %      Is there any additional information that you need that has not been
 %      provided?
-%
+Information that would be usefull is information about the way security and
+hacking ethics are taught at the university.
+
 %Ethical Theories and Concepts
 %      Consequences
 %              Who are the stakeholders ? Who is affected?
-%
+The stakeholders are the faculty members and administrators. Affected is Jon.
+
 %              What are the consequences of this course of action?
-%
+The consequences are minimal besides the work the police, and dean had with the
+case. The hacking itself didn't have severe consequences because no files were
+read.
+Jon would even argue that there are positive consequences, namely that he could
+give advice to the system administrators.
+
 %              Are some consequences especially objectionable?
-%
+Therefore the consequences are not objectable
+
 %      Rules
 %              Are any rights violated in this case?
-%
+Breaching into systems unauthorized is not permitted. Especially since it were
+patient records.
+
 %              What considerations of justice/fairness apply?
-%
+
+
+
 %              What considerations of respect for persons apply?
-%
+Very sensitive information was possible leaked and that can hurt the victims
+greatly.
+
 %              What other moral rules apply in this case?
-%
+---
+
 %      Character
 %              Are any factors in the case related to character flaws/strengths?
-%
+Jon is smart and wants to boast to his fellow-students. Also some faculty
+members believe ``Hacking'' is the lowest of lowest of crimes which is an
+uninformed statement that does not comply to Jon's view on hacking activities.
+
 %              What is the future impact on character for possible solutions to the
 %              case study?
-%
+This decision will set the tone for futere hacking related problems. It can
+harm the 
+
 %Public Policy Implications
 %      Distinguish
 %              What you feel you personally should do in this case (personal morality)
-%
+Personally a stern lecture would be greatly sufficient.
+
 %              What everyone should be required to do (duty and law)
-%
+By law and duty this should be punished. However, not to set a tone.
+
 %              What everyone should be encouraged to do (supererogatory)
-%
+
+
 %      Also distinguish:
 %              Present state of affairs
 %                      --Law-> Minimally acceptable state of affairs